Efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combinations for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

作者：Ye X, Meng H, Guo Q, Liang X, Chen X, Li Y · 发表于：Medicine · 年份：2026 · DOI：10.1097/MD.0000000000050023 · 被引用次数：38 · 研究领域：Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors、Small Cell Lung Carcinoma、Lung Neoplasms、Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols、Humans、Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic、Bayes Theorem、Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has become a major clinical research focus. Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have been treated with different first-line ICI combinations in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but the optimal combination strategy has not yet been determined. Our aim was to evaluate this strategy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Articles published from inception to October 20, 2024 were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE. Candidates were RCTs using ICI treatments as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. According to PRISMA guidelines, 3 independent investigators extracted data. Hazard/odds ratios (HRs/ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adverse event (AEs) were extracted. ICI combinations were compared for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and AEs. A random-effects model and Bayesian network meta-analysis were used. PROSPERO: CRD42023388838. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 8 RCTs with 3910 patients. Overall, ICI-chemotherapy provided superior OS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.86), PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.82), ORR (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.42) and DCR (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.24) compared with chemotherapy alone. A higher risk of any grade irAEs (OR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.09 to 7.18) and grade ≥ 3 irAEs (OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 2....