Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Diagnostic value of serological scores for the detection of liver steatosis in people living with HIV in low- and middle-income countries.

作者:Marie K. Plaisy, Carlotta Mondoka, Rodrigo Moreira, Niha Samala, Rohidas Borse, Mark H. Kuniholm, Albert Minga, Gilles Wandeler, Álvaro López-Íñiguez, D. Michael, Jeremy Ross, Fabienne Shumbusho, Ephrem Mensah, Brenda Crabtree‐Ramírez, Helen Byakwaga, Dhanushi Rupasinghe, Tinei Shamu, Gad Murenzi, Fiona Mureithi, Lameck Diero, Jean Paul Mivumbi, Dung T. H. Nguyen, Fernanda Maruri, Antoine Jaquet, Hugo Perazzo · 发表于:Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern · 年份:2026 · DOI:10.48620/93616 · 研究领域:Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment、HIV-related health complications and treatments、Hepatitis C virus research

Background The accuracy of Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) to predict liver steatosis in people living with HIV (PLWH) remains poorly studied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We assessed their diagnostic performances in a multiregional cohort.Methods This cross-sectional analysis included PLWH aged ≥40 years on antiretroviral therapy for ≥6 months at enrolment (2020-2023) in the Sentinel Research Network (SRN) of IeDEA consortium, across 12 HIV clinics in Asia-Pacific, Americas, and central, East, southern and West Africa regions. Liver steatosis was defined based on Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) ≥248 dB/m using vibration-controlled transient elastography. HSI was evaluated in the overall population, while FLI was assessed and compared to HSI in a subset of participants with available data. Model discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and model calibration with calibration plots. A decision curve analysis was performed to compare their clinical utility.Results Among 2,195 PLWH assessed using CAP, 624 (28.4%) presented with liver steatosis. HSI showed acceptable discriminative ability (AUROC = 0.74) but poor calibration, generally overestimating the risk, except in Asia-Pacific region. FLI performed better than HSI (AUROC = 0.80, p < 0.001), and demonstrated good calibration except in sub-Saharan Africa. Both scores showed high clinical utility, with FLI demonstrating a ...