Global access and safety of robotic-assisted surgery for inguinal hernia and gallstone disease worldwide: A pooled multinational cohort study across 110 countries.
作者:Dhanya Nantha Kumar, John Buchanan, Adewale Adisa, Arda Işık, Marie Carmela Lapitan, Richard Evans, Ewen M. Harrison, Ewen A. Griffiths, Maria Picciochi, Parvez Haque, Aneel Bhangu, Sivesh K. Kamarajah · 发表于:Impact Surgery · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.62463/surgery.294 · 被引用次数:1 · 研究领域:Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques、Surgical Simulation and Training、Hernia repair and management
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is rapidly expanding for common surgical procedures worldwide. This study aimed to measure global access and safety of this technology in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair and cholecystectomy. Methods: This analysis included patients undergoing cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia from two contemporary global prospective cohort studies (GECKO, n=52,163; HIPPO, n=18,041). Hierarchical multilevel logistic regression models were used to quantify associations between operative approach (open, laparoscopy, RAS, minimally invasive converted to open) and surgical safety, measured by 30-day postoperative complications, adjusting for hospital, patient, and operative-level factors. Results: This study included 70,204 patients across 110 countries of whom 857 (1.2%) underwent RAS (high income, n=807; upper middle income, n=17; lower-middle or low income, n=33). Of RAS performed in high income countries, 480 (59.5%) were in the USA and 120 (14.9%) were in the United Kingdom. The overall 30-day complications were 15.0%, similar in patients undergoing laparoscopy (13.8%) and RAS (13.1%), but higher in open (16.8%) or minimally invasive converted to open (42.3%). In adjusted analysis compared to laparoscopy, there were no significant difference in 30-day complications with RAS (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.56). However, open (2.56, 2.28-2.88) and minimally invasive converted to open surgery (3.92, 3.43-4.48) were associat...