DRIPS: Domain Randomisation for Image-based Perivascular spaces Segmentation

作者：Luna Bitar, Mario Díaz, Roberto Duarte Coello, María Valdés Hernández, Hendrik Mattern, Katja Neumann, Malte Pfister, Carolin Beck, Huy Nguyen Trong, Erelle Fuchs, Serena Tang, Duygu Tosun, Bianca Besteher, Tonia Rocktäschel, Philipp A. Reuken, Andreas Stallmach, Nils Opel, Christian Gaser, Martin A. Walter, Marc Dörner, Philipp Arndt, Daniel Behme, Christiane Piechowiak, Yves Lading, Patrick Müller, Ruediger C. Braun‐Dullaeus, Sven G. Meuth, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Stefanie Schreiber, María Trujillo, Emrah Düzel, Gabriel Ziegler, José Bernal · 发表于：medRxiv · 年份：2025 · DOI：10.1101/2025.10.22.25337423 · 被引用次数：2 · 研究领域：Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus、Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders、Head and Neck Surgical Oncology

Perivascular spaces (PVS) are emerging as sensitive imaging markers of brain health. Yet, accurate out-of-sample PVS segmentation remains challenging since existing methods are modality-specific, require dataset-specific tuning, or rely on manual labels for (re-)training. We propose DRIPS (Domain Randomisation for Image-based PVS Segmentation), a physics-inspired framework that integrates anatomical and shape priors with a physics-based image generation process to produce synthetic brain images and labels for on-the-fly deep learning model training. By introducing variability through resampling, geometric and intensity transformations, and simulated artefacts, it generalises well to real-world data. We evaluated DRIPS on MRI data from five cohorts spanning diverse health conditions (N = 165; T1w and T2w, isotropic and anisotropic imaging) and on a 3D ex vivo brain model reconstructed from histology. We evaluated its performance using the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) against manual segmentations and compared it with classical and deep learning methods, including Frangi, RORPO, SHIVA-PVS, and nnU-Net. Only DRIPS and Frangi achieved AUPRC values above chance across all cohorts and the ex vivo model. On isotropic data, DRIPS and nnU-Net performed comparably, outperforming the next-best method by a median of +0.17-0.39 AUPRC and +0.09-0.26 DSC. On anisotropic data, DRIPS outperformed all competitors by a median of +0.13-0.22 A...