Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

A harmonized frailty index using global aging data

作者:Benjamin Seligman, M.D. Ward, Maddalena Ferranna, David E. Bloom, Rose Anne Kenny, Ariela R. Orkaby · 发表于:The Journals of Gerontology Series A · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1093/gerona/glaf217 · 被引用次数:4 · 研究领域:Frailty in Older Adults、Retirement, Disability, and Employment、Nutrition and Health in Aging

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a common syndrome among older adults, associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Work harmonizing frailty measurement across 25 countries and regions and different socioeconomic environments is limited. A harmonized definition is needed to assess frailty across settings to inform comparative studies of health and healthcare. METHODS: Data on adults aged 50+ from 8 health and retirement surveys were analyzed: CHARLS (China), ELSA (England and Wales), ELSI (Brazil), HRS (USA), LASI (India), MHAS (Mexico), SHARE (Europe and Israel), and TILDA (Ireland). We produced a 30-item deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) from shared variables. We assessed within-survey distributions and, in 4 surveys with available data (HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA), association with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 184 715 participants were included; mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9.80) and 55.1% were female. Mean (SD) FI was 0.196 (0.133), and 39.2% were frail. Frailty distributions were right-skewed, with higher median FI for females than males (p < .0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival with greater frailty in studies with survival data. Hazard ratios (95% CI, p value) for severe frailty (FI ≥0.4) compared with non-frailty (FI <0.1) after adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status were 5.50 (4.89-6.19), 4.36 (3.67-5.18), 8.81 (6.44-12.05), and 3.97 (2.99-5.27) for HRS, MHAS, SHARE, and TILDA, respectively, all with p < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: This is a harmonized F...