Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Cholecystitis and cholangiocarcinoma: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

作者:Xing Gao, Hao Gao, Song Wang, Futian Tang, Yang Zhao, Yumin Li · 发表于:BMC Gastroenterology · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-04199-x · 被引用次数:2 · 研究领域:Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies、Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders、Liver Diseases and Immunity

BACKGROUND: . Epidemiological studies have suggested that cholecystitis may increase the risk of hepatobiliary cancers. However, whether this association indicates an independent causal relationship remains unclear. Given that observational studies are prone to residual confounding and bias, limiting the strength of causal inference. Our study aimed to evaluate whether cholecystitis is an independent risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: Instrumental variables were identified as independent single nucleotide polymorphisms highly associated with cholecystitis (n = 25). The entire dataset from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was utilized to obtain cholangiocarcinoma outcome data (n = 25). In this study, five MR statistical techniques (Inverse Variance Weighted, MR Egger, Weighted Median, Simple Mode, and Weighted mode) were used. The MR Egger intercept test, leave-one-out analysis, and the funnel plot were all utilized in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Results of the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method genetically predicted cholecystitis was associated with higher risk of cholangiocarcinoma, with an odds ratio of 2.915 (95% CI = 1.122-7.575, P = 0.038). Weighted Median Method also demonstrated consistent direction of effect (P = 0.016). However, MR-Egger, Simple Mode, and Weighted Mode all showed no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Both funnel plots and MR Egger intercepts indicated the absence of a...