Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Cardiac Output Method Comparison Studies (COMPARE) Statement

作者:Bernd Saugel, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Moritz Flick, Joseph Rinehart, Robert H. Thiele, Simon Tilma Vistisen, Karsten Bartels, Maxime Cannesson, Maurizio Cecconi, Michelle S. Chew, Daniel De Backer, Alexandre Joosten, Ashish Khanna, Jerrold H Levy, Agnes S. Meidert, Antonio Messina, Xavier Monnet, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Michael R Pinsky, Alparslan Turan, Iwan C.C. van der Horst, Jean‐Louis Vincent, Karim Kouz · 发表于:Anesthesiology · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000005559 · 被引用次数:8 · 研究领域:Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy、Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies、Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Cardiac output is a key cardiovascular variable quantifying global blood flow. The measurement performance of cardiac output monitoring methods is investigated in validation studies, which are method comparison studies determining the agreement between cardiac output values measured with a test method and those measured with a reference method. The StatistiCal analysis and repOrting of cardiac output Method comPARison studiEs (COMPARE) statement provides a framework for designing, performing, and reporting cardiac output method comparison studies and includes a checklist of 29 items that are essential for reporting of those studies. Considering and reporting the items specified in the COMPARE checklist will help standardize cardiac output method comparison studies and increase the external validity of the results.