Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

The Key Steps and Distinct Performance Trends of Pyrrolic vs Pyridinic M–N–C Catalysts in Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction

作者:Qiuling Jiang, Mingyao Gu, Pei Shen, Tianyi Wang, Fangzhou Liu, Xin Yang, Di Zhang, Zhijian Wu, Ying Wang, Wei Li, Hao Li · 发表于:Journal of the American Chemical Society · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1021/jacs.5c09199 · 被引用次数:56 · 研究领域:Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction、Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion、Hydrogen Storage and Materials

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction (NO 3 RR) offers a sustainable route for ambient ammonia synthesis. While metal–nitrogen–carbon (M–N–C) single-atom catalysts have emerged as promising candidates for the NO 3 RR, the structure–activity relations underlying their catalytic behavior remain to be elucidated. Through systematic analysis of reported experimental data and pH-field coupled microkinetic modeling on a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale, we reveal that the coordination-dependent activity originates from distinct scaling relations governed by metal-intermediate interactions. M-N-Pyrrolic catalysts generally demonstrate higher turnover frequencies for ammonia production than M-N-Pyridinic catalysts. Meanwhile, the adsorption and protonation of nitrate, which is a step often dismissed and/or assumed to be simultaneous in many previous reports, are identified to be the rate-determining step (RDS) in the NO 3 RR. Remarkably, our subsequent experimental validation confirms the theoretical predictions under both neutral and alkaline conditions. This study offers a comprehensive mechanistic framework for interpreting the electrocatalytic activity of M–N–C catalysts in the NO 3 RR, showing that a classical thermodynamic “limiting-potential model” is not sufficiently accurate to capture the RDS and the catalytic performance trends of different materials (even on M-N-Pyrrolic and M-N-Pyridinic catalysts). The...