Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Korean Patients with HER2-Negative, Untreated, Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial (ATTRACTION-4)

作者：Yoon‐Koo Kang, Min‐Hee Ryu, Do‐Youn Oh, Sang Cheul Oh, Sun Young Rha, Keun‐Wook Lee, Ik Joo Chung, Sung Yong Oh, Sun Jin Sym, Won Ki Kang, Jong Gwang Kim, Byoung Yong Shim, Inho Kim, Jin Young Kim, Eun‐Kee Song, Hyo Jin Lee, Seok Yun Kang, Dong‐Hoe Koo, So Yeon Oh · 发表于：Cancer Research and Treatment · 年份：2025 · DOI：10.4143/crt.2024.913 · 被引用次数：3 · 研究领域：Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes、Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment、Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

PURPOSE: We report the safety and efficacy of nivolumab+chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in the Korean subpopulation of the ATTRACTION-4 clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ATTRACTION-4 (NCT02746796) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of patients aged ≥ 20 years with histologically confirmed unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients received nivolumab or placebo, both combined with physician-choice chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 [tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil] [SOX] or oral capecitabine [CAPOX]). RESULTS: Overall, 464 patients were initially screened in Korea and 291 were randomized to nivolumab+chemotherapy (total/SOX/CAPOX: 148/66/82 patients) or placebo+chemotherapy (total/SOX/CAPOX: 143/61/82 patients). Centrally assessed progression-free survival (median, 14.75 vs. 8.34 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.73; p < 0.001), overall survival (19.7 vs. 14.9 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.02; p=0.065), overall response rate (54.7% vs. 47.6%), and duration of response (16.03 vs. 9.86 months) favored nivolumab+chemotherapy vs. placebo+chemotherapy. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (56.1% vs. 44.1%), and any-grade endocrine (9.5% vs. 4.2%), hepatic (23.0% vs. 14.7%), hypersensitivity and infusion reactions (15.5% vs. 7.0%), renal (4.1% vs. 0.7%), and skin (44.6% ...