Participatory mapping of the forest community stakeholders in Europe focusing on forest genetic resources, forest reproductive material, and protected forests
作者:Tadej Rogelja, L. Secco, Franck Lefèvre, Egbert Beuker, Marjana Westergren, Bruno Fady, Santiago C. González‐Martínez, Tor Myking, Luc Pâques, Christian Rellstab, Giovanni G. Vendramin, Thibaud Chauvin, Marcela van Loo, Ulla Ovaska, Jacopo Giacomoni, Anže Japelj, Anna‐Maria Farsakoglou, Heino Konrad, Sofia Caiolo, Aurore Desgroux, D.E. Kjær, Jo Van Brusselen, Mauro Masiero · 发表于:Trees Forests and People · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100913 · 被引用次数:3 · 研究领域:Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development、Forest Management and Policy、Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
The genetic diversity of forest trees, as provided by Forest Genetic Resources (FGR) and being the basis for the production of Forest Reproductive Material (FRM), is fundamental for maintaining forest resilience, adaptability, health, productivity, and biological diversity. Despite their importance, stakeholder governance of genetic diversity remains under-studied. This study aims to address this gap by mapping the forest stakeholder landscape FGR governance. Using the Quadruple Helix Approach, we categorised stakeholders into academia, industry, government, and civil society identifying relevant sub-communities. The mapping process involved iterative revisions through expert consultations, workshops, and literature scoping. Results show that the FGR sub-community is situated between strict conservation efforts and applied forestry, supporting both genetic conservation and productive forest management. The FRM sub-community, dealing specifically with the production and deployment of FRM, prioritises tree breeding, seed production, and afforestation/reforestation programmes. Meanwhile, the Protected Forests (PF) sub-community focuses on strict nature conservation, advocating minimal human intervention while facing pressures from resource extraction, tourism, and land-use conflicts. The diverging attitudes and values of close-to-nature forest management, intensive forestry, and strict protections, respectively, exist within same stakeholder groups, as well as among different on...