Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with imlunestrant, investigator’s choice standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant + abemaciclib: Results from the phase III EMBER-3 trial.

作者:Giuseppe Curigliano, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, François‐Clément Bidard, Sung‐Bae Kim, Eriko Tokunaga, Philippe Aftimos, C. Saura Manich, Lisa A. Carey, Meena Okera, Everton GA Melo, Flora Zagouri, Manuel Magallanes, Nuri Karadurmuş, Shakeela Bahadur, Rebecca M. Speck, Xuejing Aimee Wang, Suzanne R.L. Young, Komal Jhaveri, Nadia Harbeck · 发表于:Journal of Clinical Oncology · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1001 · 被引用次数:7 · 研究领域:Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies、Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology、HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

1001 Background: Imlunestrant (imlu) is a next-generation, brain-penetrant, oral selective estrogen receptor degrader. The EMBER-3 trial, in patients (pts) with ER+, HER2- ABC who had disease progression on or after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy, showed significant progression free survival (PFS) improvement with imlu vs standard therapy (SOC, fulvestrant or exemestane) in pts with ESR1 mutations ( ESR1 m), and with imlunestrant+abemaciclib (imlu+abema) vs imlu in all pts, regardless of ESR1 m. Exploratory PRO analyses are presented here. Methods: EORTC QLQ-C30 was administered at baseline (BL) and every 8 weeks until treatment discontinuation. Prespecified QLQ-C30 analysis used a longitudinal mixed model for repeated measures to calculate mean change from BL in pts with BL and ≥1 post-BL score. PRO-CTCAE (diarrhea frequency) was administered weekly, reporting 0 (never) to 4 (almost constantly). PRO-CTCAE (injection site reaction [ISR]) was administered to fulvestrant recipients weekly for 2 weeks post-injection, reporting yes/no (pain, swelling, redness). Descriptive analysis was used for PRO-CTCAE. Results: In pts with ESR1 m, imlu monotherapy was associated with many improved or maintained EORTC QLQ-C30 scores, whereas scores with SOC were declined or maintained. Specifically, pts with ESR1 m on imlu had improved global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL) and physical function (PF) scores, while scores with SOC declined (mean change differences between treatments...