Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Proteomic Signatures for Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation

作者:Hanjin Park, Faye L. Norby, Daehoon Kim, Eunsun Jang, Hee Tae Yu, Tae‐Hoon Kim, Jae‐Sun Uhm, Jung‐Hoon Sung, Hui‐Nam Pak, Moon‐Hyoung Lee, Pil‐Sung Yang, Boyoung Joung · 发表于:Circulation · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.124.073457 · 被引用次数:16 · 研究领域:Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes、Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications、Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

BACKGROUND: Proteomic signatures might improve disease prediction and enable targeted disease prevention and management. We explored whether a protein risk score derived from large-scale proteomics data improves risk prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A total of 51 680 individuals with 1459 unique plasma protein measurements and without a history of AF were included from the UKB-PPP (UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project). A protein risk score was developed with lasso-penalized Cox regression from a random subset of 70% (36 176 individuals, 54.4% women, 2155 events) and was tested on the remaining 30% (15 504 individuals, 54.4% women, 910 events). The protein risk score was externally replicated with the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; 11 012 individuals, 54.8% women, 1260 events). RESULTS: The protein risk score formula developed from the UKB-PPP derivation set was composed of 165 unique plasma proteins, and 15 of them were associated with atrial remodeling. In the UKB-PPP test set, a 1-SD increase in protein risk score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.20 (95% CI, 2.05-2.41) for incident AF. The C index for a model including CHARGE-AF (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Atrial Fibrillation), NT-proBNP (N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide), polygenic risk score, and protein risk score was 0.816 (95% CI, 0.802-0.829) compared with 0.771 (95% CI, 0.755-0.787) for a model including CHARGE-AF, NT-proBNP, and polygen...