Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Exploring secondary extramedullary myeloma disease: a five-predictor scoring system with spotlight on double-hit cytogenetics

作者:Tao Yi, Shiwei Jin, Zhe Wang, Mengmeng Pan, Wanyan Ouyang, Jie Xu, Yuanfang Liu, Yan Wang, Weiping Zhang, Li J, Jian‐Qing Mi · 发表于:BMC Medicine · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-04086-y · 被引用次数:3 · 研究领域:Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments、Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment、Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research

BACKGROUND: Extramedullary myeloma disease (EMD) can present at disease relapse (secondary EMD, sEMD) and confers an aggressive clinical course. Identifying predictive markers for sEMD is crucial for clinical management. METHODS: Our study, spanning February 2013 to October 2022, identified sEMD in 77 (12.5%) of 618 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. We categorized sEMD patients into bone-related extramedullary (EM-B) and extraosseous extramedullary (EM-E) relapse groups, as well as into early and late relapse groups based on the median interval from initial MM diagnosis, and assessed their overall survival (OS). We investigated independent predictors for the development of sEMD and focused on double-hit (DH) myeloma, one of the predictors of sEMD. Through the analysis of single-cell RNA from DH myeloma samples, we explored the potential mechanisms by which it may contribute to sEMD. RESULTS: Median OS post-sEMD diagnosis was 11 months, with no significant OS difference between EM-B and EM-E relapse groups. A median interval of 22 months from initial MM diagnosis to sEMD relapse divided the 77 sEMD patients into early and late relapse groups, with early sEMD associated with significantly inferior OS post-sEMD (5.0 vs 27.0 months, p = 0.028). Driven by the prognostic difference of early vs late sEMD relapse, we used a time-to-event model and identified five independent predictors: double-hit (DH) cytogenetics, ≥ 3 osteolytic lesions, IgD subtype, and non-autologous ste...