Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Development of PDAC diagnosis and prognosis evaluation models based on machine learning

作者:Yingqi Xiao, Shixin Sun, Naxin Zheng, Jing Zhao, Xiaohan Li, Jianmin Xu, Han Li, Changde Du, Lijun Zeng, Juling Zhang, Xiuyun Yin, Yuan Huang, Xuemei Yang, Yuan Fang, Xingwang Jia, Boan Li, Bo Li · 发表于:BMC Cancer · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13929-z · 被引用次数:11 · 研究领域:Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research、AI in cancer detection、Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to detect early and highly aggressive, often leading to poor patient prognosis. Existing serum biomarkers like CA19-9 are limited in early diagnosis, failing to meet clinical needs. Machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL) technologies have shown great potential in biomedicine. This study aims to establish PDAC differential diagnosis and prognosis assessment models using ML combined with serum biomarkers for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized treatment recommendations, improving early diagnosis rates and patient survival. METHODS: The study included serum biomarker data and prognosis information from 117 PDAC patients. ML models (Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NNET), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM)) were used for differential diagnosis, evaluated by accuracy, Kappa test, ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. COX proportional hazards model and DeepSurv DL model predicted survival risk, compared by C-index and Log-rank test. Based on DeepSurv's risk predictions, personalized treatment recommendations were made and their effectiveness assessed. RESULTS: Effective PDAC diagnosis and prognosis models were built using ML. The validation set data shows that the accuracy of the RF, NNET, SVM, and GBM models are 84.21%, 84.21%, 76.97%, and 83.55%; the sensitivity are 91.26%, 90.29%, 89.32%, and 88.35%; and the specificity are 69.39%, 71.43%, 51.02%, and 73.47%...