Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Comparison analysis of ICIs and chemotherapy combined with or without lenvatinib as first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

作者:Miao Li, Tong Li, Rongxin Chen, Yan Wang · 发表于:BMC Cancer · 年份:2025 · DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13814-9 · 被引用次数:2 · 研究领域:Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies、Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders、Liver Diseases and Immunity

BACKGROUND: Effective first-line treatments for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remain limited. This real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy combined with or without Lenvatinib as first-line treatment in unresectable ICC patients and identify predictors of treatment response and prognosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 58 patients with unresectable ICC received either dual therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy) or triple therapy (ICIs plus chemotherapy and Lenvatinib) as first-line treatment. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Survival curve was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed to investigate risk factors of PFS and OS. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between triple therapy and dual therapy as first-line treatment for unresectable ICC patients in terms of PFS (median PFS: 10.3 vs. 11.1 months, P > 0.05) and OS (median OS: 14.0 vs. 15.0 months, P > 0.05). The ORR (39.4% vs. 30.4%) and DCR (90.9% vs. 73.9%) were comparable between the triple therapy group and dual therapy group (P > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, tumor burden score (TBS, ≥ 8) and tumor number (≥ 2) were associated with prolonged PFS (P < 0.05), while TBS was an independent factor for OS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy did not demonstrate a...