Comparison of 2D and 3D radiomics features with conventional features based on contrast-enhanced CT images for preoperative prediction the risk of thymic epithelial tumors

作者：Yu-Hang Yuan, Hui Zhang, Weiling Xu, Dong Dong, Peihong Gao, Caijuan Zhang, Yan Guo, Lingling Tong, Fangchao Gong · 发表于：Radiology and Oncology · 年份：2025 · DOI：10.2478/raon-2025-0016 · 被引用次数：3 · 研究领域：Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma、Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments、Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and validate 2-Dimensional (2D) and 3-Dimensional (3D) radiomics signatures based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images for preoperative prediction of the thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) risk and compare the predictive performance with conventional CT features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 149 TET patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to December 2018, and divided into high-risk group (B2/B3/TCs, n = 103) and low-risk group (A/AB/B1, n = 46). All patients were randomly assigned into the training (n = 104) and testing (n = 45) set. 14 conventional CT features were collected, and 396 radiomic features were extracted from 2D and 3D CECT images, respectively. Three models including conventional, 2D radiomics and 3D radiomics model were established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The discriminative performances of the models were demonstrated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: In the conventional model, area under the curves (AUCs) in the training and validation sets were 0.863 and 0.853, sensitivity was 78% and 55%, and specificity was 88% and 100%, respectively. The 2D model yielded AUCs of 0.854 and 0.834, sensitivity of 86% and 77%, and specificity of 72% and 86% in the training and validation sets. The 3D model revealed AUC of 0.902 and 0.906, sensitivity of 75% and 68%, and specificity of 94% and 100% in the training and validation sets. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics signa...