Parallels and discrepancies between non‐native species introductions and human migration

作者：Danish Ali Ahmed, Ronaldo Sousa, Alejandro Bortolus, Ceray Aldemir, Nicole Frances Angeli, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, J. Robert Britton, Carlos Cano‐Barbacil, Aaron Clark‐Ginsberg, Irina Culic, Ross Noel Cuthbert, Jaimie T. A. Dick, Romina D. Dimarco, Franz Essl, Teun Everts, Emili García‐Berthou, Mathew E. Hauer, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, U. Kutschera, Stefano Mammola, Irene Martín‐Forés, Olivier Morissette, Martín Andrés Nuñez, Julian D. Olden, Lucian Pârvulescu, Jan Pergl, David Renault, Axel Eduardo Rico‐Sánchez, James Charles Russell, Ismael Soto, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Tuğba Uçma Uysal, Hugo Verreycken, Lorenzo Vilizzi, Ryan John Wasserman, Priscilla M. Wehi, Phillip Joschka Haubrock · 发表于：Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 年份：2025 · DOI：10.1111/brv.70004 · 被引用次数：25 · 研究领域：Geographies of human-animal interactions、Wildlife Ecology and Conservation、Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migrati...