Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab vs lenvatinib alone in intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

作者：Fei-Da Wu, Haifeng Zhou, Wei Yang, Di Zhu, Bing Wu, Hai‐Bin Shi, Sheng Liu, Wei-Zhong Zhou · 发表于：World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology · 年份：2024 · DOI：10.4251/wjgo.v17.i1.96267 · 被引用次数：7 · 研究领域：Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis、Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer、Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer that has limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC but can induce tumour hypoxia, thereby promoting angiogenesis. Recent studies suggested that combining TACE with anti-angiogenic therapies and immunotherapy might improve efficacy. Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to sorafenib, while immune checkpoint inhibitors such as sintilimab show potential when combined with TACE. However, the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab (TACE + SL) compared to TACE with lenvatinib alone (TACE + L) in patients with intermediate-advanced HCC has not yet been investigated. AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE + SL therapy in comparison to TACE + L therapy in patients with intermediate-advanced HCC. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with intermediate-advanced HCC who received TACE plus lenvatinib with or without sintilimab between September 2019 and September 2022. Baseline characteristics were compared, and propensity score matching was applied. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated between the two groups, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS The study included 57 patients, with 30 in the TACE + SL group and 27 in the TACE + L gro...