Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation

作者:Lauren L. Nowak, Joel Moktar, Patrick Henry, Taylor Dejong, Michael D. McKee, Emil H. Schemitsch · 发表于:The Bone & Joint Journal · 年份:2024 · DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2023-1349.r1 · 被引用次数:7 · 研究领域:Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation、Bone fractures and treatments、Facial Trauma and Fracture Management

Aims: We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR). Methods: We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years). Results: We identified 14,960 DRF patients, 8,339 (55.7%) of whom underwent early surgical fixation (mean 2.9 days (SD 1.8)). In contrast, 4,042 patients (27.0%) underwent delayed fixation between eight and 14 days (mean 10.2 days (SD 2.2)), 1,892 (12.7%) between 14 and 21 days (mean 17.5 days (SD 1.9)) and 687 (4.6%) > 21 days (mean 24.8 days (SD 2.4)) post-fracture. Patients who underwent delayed fixation > 21 days post-fracture had a higher odds of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1.33 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.79) vs early fixation). This worsened for patients aged > 60 years (OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.79)). We found no difference in the odds of...