Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Erratum to: A search for $$\upmu ^+ \rightarrow \textrm{e}^+ \upgamma $$ with the first dataset of the MEG II experiment

作者:K. Afanaciev, A. Baldini, Seiji Ban, Vladimir Baranov, H. Benmansour, M. Biasotti, G. Boca, P. W. Cattaneo, G. Cavoto, F. Cei, M. Chiappini, G. Chiarello, A. Corvaglia, F. Cuna, G. Dal Maso, A. de Bari, M. De Gerone, L. Ferrari Barusso, M. Francesconi, Letizia Galli, G. Gallucci, Francesco G. Gatti, L. Gerritzen, F. Grancagnolo, E. G. Grandoni, M. Grassi, D. N. Grigoriev, M. Hildebrandt, K. Ieki, F.V. Ignatov, Fusao Ikeda, T. Iwamoto, S.V. Karpov, P.-R. Kettle, N. V. Khomutov, S. Kobayashi, A. Kolesnikov, N. Kravchuk, В. А. Крылов, N. A. Kuchinskiy, W. Kyle, T. Libeiro, V. L. Malyshev, A. Matsushita, M. Meucci, S. Mihara, W. Molzon, T. Mori, Mutsuhiro Nakao, D. Nicolò, H. Nishiguchi, Ayako Ochi, S. Ogawa, Rina Onda, W. Ootani, A. Oya, D. Palo, M. Panareo, A. Papa, V. Pettinacci, Alexander Popov, Filippo Renga, S. Ritt, M. Rossella, A. Rozhdestvensky, P. Schwendimann, Keiichiro Shimada, G. Signorelli, Masato Takahashi, G. F. Tassielli, Kazuhiro Toyoda, Y. Uchiyama, Mihoko Usami, A. Venturini, B. Vitali, C. Voena, Koji Yamamoto, K. Yanai, T. Yonemoto, Keisuke Yoshida, Yu. V. Yudin · 发表于:The European Physical Journal C · 年份:2024 · DOI:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13352-x · 被引用次数:7 · 研究领域:Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies、Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena、Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems

This erratum corrects Fig. 6 of the original article. There was a rounding error in the evaluation of the upper limit and confidence level curve for the constant PDF analysis used for cross check. Such an error caused distortions in presence of a very small number of fitted signal events and therefore is particularly evident in the distribution of pseudo-experiments for B90≲0.5×10-12 but it affects the whole range. With the constant PDF approach, the corrected 90% C.L. upper limit on the branching ratio, including systematic uncertainties, is B90=0.96×10-12. Also the B90s in the time side-bands changed. This correction does not change the results quoted in the original article obtained with the per-event PDF analysis. (Figure presented.) Comparison of the branching ratio upper limits (without systematic uncertainties) extracted by the two likelihood analyses when run over a common ensemble of pseudo-experiments (red dots). The results obtained on real data are also shown, for the analysis region (black star) and four fictitious analysis regions in the time side-bands: -3ns<-2ns, -2ns<-1ns, 1ns<2ns, 2ns<3ns (blue dots)