Detailed analysis of learning phases and outcomes in robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy

作者：Jia‐Fan Yu, Wen‐Yu Huang, Jun Wang, Wei Ao, Sisi Wang, Shao‐Jun Cai, Si‐Ying Lin, Chi‐Peng Zhou, Mengyao Li, Xiaoshan Cao, Xiang-Mao Cao, Zi-Han Tang, Zhihong Wang, Surong Hua, Wenxin Zhao, Bo Wang · 发表于：Surgical Endoscopy · 年份：2024 · DOI：10.1007/s00464-024-11247-2 · 被引用次数：9 · 研究领域：Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery、Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment、Surgical Simulation and Training

BACKGROUND: Thyroid surgery has undergone significant transformation with the introduction of minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy. These advancements offer improved precision and faster recovery but also present unique challenges. This study aims to compare the learning curves, operational efficiencies, and patient outcomes of robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing 258 robotic (da Vinci) and 214 endoscopic thyroidectomy cases. Key metrics such as operation duration, drainage volume, lymph node dissection outcomes, and hypoparathyroidism incidence were assessed to understand surgical learning curves and efficiency. RESULTS: Robotic thyroidectomy showed a longer learning curve with initially longer operation times and higher drainage volumes but superior lymph node dissection outcomes. Both techniques were safe, with no permanent hypoparathyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve damage reported. The study delineated four distinct stages in the robotic and endoscopic surgery learning curve, each marked by specific improvements in proficiency. Endoscopic thyroidectomy displayed a shorter learning curve, leading to quicker operational efficiency gains. CONCLUSION: Robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomies are viable minimally invasive approaches, each with its learning curves and efficiency metrics. Despite initial challenges and a longer learning period for robotic surgery, it...