Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Evaluating the efficacy of percutaneous puncture biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary lesions

作者:Xiao Jiang, Jun Chen, Fang-Fang Gu, Zhongrong Li, Yu-Shan Song, Jing-Jing Long, Shuzhen Zhang, Tingting Xu, Yongjun Tang, Jiying Gu, Xiangming Fang · 发表于:World Journal of Clinical Cases · 年份:2024 · DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3791 · 被引用次数:5 · 研究领域:Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment、Ultrasound in Clinical Applications、Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

BACKGROUND The incidence and mortality of lung cancer have increased annually. Accurate diagnosis can help improve therapeutic efficacy of interventions and prognosis. Percutaneous lung biopsy is a reliable method for the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous lung biopsy technology has been widely promoted and applied in recent years. AIM To investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-guided percutaneous biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions. METHODS We retrospectively collected data on 237 patients with peripheral thoracic focal lesions who underwent puncture biopsy at Wuxi People’s Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: The CEUS-guided before lesion puncture group (contrast group) and conventional ultrasound-guided group (control group). Analyze the diagnostic efficacy of the puncture biopsy, impact of tumor size, and number of puncture needles and complications were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS Accurate pathological results were obtained for 92.83% (220/237) of peripheral lung lesions during the first biopsy, with an accuracy rate of 95.8% (113/118) in the contrast group and 89.9% (107/119) in the control group. The difference in the area under the curve (AUC) between the contrast and the control groups was not statistically significant (0.952 vs 0.902, respectively; P > 0.05). However, when the lesion diameter ≥ 5 cm, the diagnostic AUC of the contrast group was hig...