Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring-guided glucose management in inpatients with diabetes receiving short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized clinical trial

作者:Yaxin Wang, Jingyi Lu, Ming Wang, Jiaying Ni, Jiamin Yu, Shiyun Wang, Liang Wu, Wei Lu, Wei Zhu, Jingyi Guo, Xiangtian Yu, Yuqian Bao, Jian Zhou · 发表于:The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · 年份:2024 · DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101067 · 被引用次数:9 · 研究领域:Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients、Diabetes Management and Research、Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

Background: The use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) technology remains largely investigational in the hospital setting. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rtCGM in inpatients with diabetes who were treated with short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Methods: In this randomized, parallel controlled trial conducted on the endocrinology wards in a tertiary hospital located in Shanghai, adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who required short-term CSII during hospitalization were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either rtCGM-based glucose monitoring and management program or point-of-care (POC) standard of care (8 times/day) with blinded CGM. Primary outcome measure was the difference in the percentage of time within the target glucose range of 3.9-10 mmol/L (TIR, %). This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300068933). Findings: Among the 475 randomized participants (237 in the rtCGM group and 238 in the POC group), the mean age of was 60 ± 13 years, and the mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level was 9.4 ± 1.8%. The CGM-recorded mean TIR was 71.1 ± 15.8% in the rtCGM group and 62.9 ± 18.9% in the POC group, with a mean difference of 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1-11.4%, P < 0.001). The mean time above range >10 mmol/L was significantly lower in the rtCGM group than in the POC group (28.3 ± 15.8% vs. 36.6 ± 19.0%, P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant between-group difference in the ti...