Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of Alzheimer’s disease drugs: A meta-analysis and systematic review

作者:Y. Chen, Min Lai, Ming Tao · 发表于:Medicine · 年份:2024 · DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000037799 · 被引用次数:26 · 研究领域:Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases、Alzheimer's disease research and treatments、Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. Dementia severity was assessed mainly through cognitive function, psychobehavioral symptoms, and daily living ability. Currently, there are not many drugs that can be selected to treat mild to moderate AD, and the value of drugs remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs), memantine, and sodium oligomannate (GV-971) in the treatment of patients with AD. Additionally, molecular docking analysis will be used to investigate the binding affinities of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine with key receptor proteins associated with AD, including beta-amyloid (Abeta), microtubule-associated protein (MAP), apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4), and Mitofusin-2 (MFN2), to further validate the results of the meta-analysis. METHODS: We obtained clinical trials characterized by randomization, placebo control, and double-blinded methodologies concerning ChEIs, memantine, and GV-971. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.4 software. Molecular docking was also conducted to evaluate the results. RESULTS: All drugs improved the cognitive function, with the effect value ranging from -1.23 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.30) for 20 mg memantine to -3.29 (95% CI -4.14 to -2.45) for 32 mg galantamine. Although 32 mg galanthamine and GV-971 did not improve the clinicians' Global Impression of Chang...