Effect of 5:2 Regimens: Energy-Restricted Diet or Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Combined With Resistance Exercise on Glycemic Control and Cardiometabolic Health in Adults With Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

作者：Mian Li, Jie Li, Yu Xu, Jinli Gao, Qiuyu Cao, Yi Ding, Zhuojun Xin, Ming Lu, Xiao-Ting Li, Haihong Song, Jue Shen, Tianzhichao Hou, Ruixin He, Ling Li, Zhiyun Zhao, Min Xu, Jieli Lu, Tiange Wang, Shuangyuan Wang, Hong Lin, Ruizhi Zheng, Jie Zheng, Callum J Baker, Shenghan Lai, Nathan A. Johnson, Guang Ning, Stephen M. Twigg, Weiqing Wang, Yan Liu, Yufang Bi · 发表于：Diabetes Care · 年份：2024 · DOI：10.2337/dc24-0241 · 被引用次数：27 · 研究领域：Dietary Effects on Health、Diet and metabolism studies、Muscle metabolism and nutrition

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the effects of a 5:2 diet (2 days per week of energy restriction by formula diet) or an exercise (2 days per week of high-intensity interval training and resistance training) intervention compared with routine lifestyle education (control) on glycemic control and cardiometabolic health among adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This two-center, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial recruited 326 participants with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes and randomized them into 12 weeks of diet intervention (n = 109), exercise intervention (n = 108), or lifestyle education (control) (n = 109). The primary outcome was the change of glycemic control measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between the diet or exercise intervention groups and the control group after the 12-week intervention. RESULTS: The diet intervention significantly reduced HbA1c level (%) after the 12-week intervention (-0.72, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.48) compared with the control group (-0.37, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.15) (diet vs. control -0.34, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.11, P = 0.007). The reduction in HbA1c level in the exercise intervention group (-0.46, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.23) did not significantly differ from the control group (exercise vs. control -0.09, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.15, P = 0.47). The exercise intervention group was superior in maintaining lean body mass. Both diet and exercise interventions induced improvements in...