A Cluster Analysis of Initial Primary Care Orders for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain

作者：Christopher Joyce, Eric J. Roseen, Clair Smith, Charity G. Patterson, Christine M. McDonough, Emily Hurstak, Natalia E. Morone, Jason M. Beneciuk, Joel M. Stevans, Anthony Delitto, Robert Saper · 发表于：The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · 年份：2023 · DOI：10.3122/jabfm.2023.230123r2 · 被引用次数：10 · 研究领域：Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation、Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation、Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

PURPOSE: Primary care physicians (PCPs) often face a complex intersection of patient expectations, evidence, and policy that influences their care recommendations for acute low back pain (aLBP). The purpose of this study was to elucidate patterns of PCP orders for patients with aLBP, identify the most common patterns, and describe patient clinical and demographic characteristics associated with patterns of aLBP care. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 9574 aLBP patients presenting to 1 of 77 primary care practices in 4 geographic locations in the United States. We performed a cluster analysis of PCP orders extracted from electronic health records within the first 21 days of an initial visit for aLBP. RESULTS: 1401 (15%) patients did not receive a PCP order related to back pain within the first 21 days of their initial visit. These patients predominantly had aLBP without leg pain, less back-related disability, and were at low-risk for persistent disability. Of the remaining 8146 patients, we found 4 distinct order patterns: combined nonpharmacologic and first-line medication (44%); second-line medication (39%); imaging (10%); and specialty referral (7%). Among all patients, 29% received solely 1 order from their PCP. PCPs more often combined different guideline concordant and discordant orders. Patients with higher self-reported disability and psychological distress were more likely to receive guideline discordant care. CONCLUSION: Guideline discordant orders such...