Maternal satisfaction with group care: a systematic review

作者：Fitim Sadiku, Hana Bucinca, Florence Talrich, Vlorian Molliqaj, Erza Selmani, Christine McCourt, Marlies Rijnders, George A. Little, David C. Goodman, Sharon Schindler Rising, Ilir Hoxha · 发表于：AJOG Global Reports · 年份：2023 · DOI：10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100301 · 被引用次数：29 · 研究领域：Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions、Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum、Global Maternal and Child Health

OBJECTIVE: This review examined the quantitative relationship between group care and overall maternal satisfaction compared with standard individual care. DATA SOURCES: We searched CINAHL, Clinical Trials, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from the beginning of 2003 through June 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that reported the association between overall maternal satisfaction and centering-based perinatal care where the control group was standard individual care. We included randomized and observational designs. METHODS: Screening and independent data extraction were carried out by 4 researchers. We extracted data on study characteristics, population, design, intervention characteristics, satisfaction measurement, and outcome. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane tools for Clinical Trials (RoB2) and observational studies (ROBINS-I). We summarized the study, intervention, and satisfaction measurement characteristics. We presented the effect estimates of each study descriptively using a forest plot without performing an overall meta-analysis. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of variations in study designs and methods used to measure satisfaction. We presented studies reporting mean values and odds ratios in 2 separate plots. The presentation of studies in forest plots was organized by type of study design. RESULTS: A total of 7685 women participated in the studies included in the review. We found...