Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Diabetes mellitus in long‐term survivors with colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer: Prevalence and prognosis. A population‐based study

作者:Keyi Yang, Daniela Doege, Melissa S. Y. Thong, Lena Koch‐Gallenkamp, Linda Weißer, Heike Bertram, Andrea Eberle, Bernd Holleczek, Alice Nennecke, Annika Waldmann, Sylke Ruth Zeißig, Ron Pritzkuleit, Lina Jansen, Hermann Brenner, Volker Arndt · 发表于:Cancer · 年份:2023 · DOI:10.1002/cncr.35133 · 被引用次数:10 · 研究领域:Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer、Cancer Risks and Factors、Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM). Previous studies on the prevalence and prognostic impact of DM in cancer survivors were limited by small sample sizes or short follow-up times. We aimed to compare the patient-reported prevalence of DM in long-term cancer survivors (LTCS), who survived 5 years or more after cancer diagnosis, with that in cancer-free controls, and to estimate the mortality risk among LTCS according to DM status. METHODS: Our population-based cohort comprised 6952 LTCS diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer between 1994 and 2004, recruited in 2008-2011 (baseline), and followed until 2019. A total of 1828 cancer-free individuals served as controls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the prevalence of DM in LTCS and controls, and according to covariates at baseline. Mortality among LTCS according to DM was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 962 (13.8%) LTCS at baseline reported DM. Prevalence of DM in LTCS was not higher than in cancer-free controls, both at baseline (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) and at follow-up (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04). Prevalence of DM in LTCS was associated with cancer site, older age, lower education, higher socioeconomic deprivation, higher body mass index, physical inactivity, other comorbidities, and poorer prognosis (adjusted hazard ratio [all-cause mortality] = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.44). CONCLUSION: DM ...