Flow diverters versus stent-assisted coiling in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

作者：Jiangli Han, Xin Tong, Mingyang Han, Fei Peng, Hao Niu, Fei Liu, Aihua Liu · 发表于：Journal of neurosurgery · 年份：2023 · DOI：10.3171/2023.7.jns23444 · 被引用次数：17 · 研究领域：Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications、Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment、Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

OBJECTIVE: Flow diverters (FDs) have been used in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (IVADAs) with seemingly more favorable outcomes compared with stent-assisted coiling (SAC). However, the benefits of FDs over SAC in unruptured IVADAs need further evaluation. METHODS: This was a propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with unruptured IVADAs treated with FDs or SAC at the authors' hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed. Propensity score matching at 1:1 was based on age, significant stenosis adjacent to aneurysmal dilatation, maximum diameter, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery involvement. Periprocedural cerebrovascular complications and angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the two matched groups. RESULTS: A total of 124 unruptured IVADAs in 123 patients (median age 53 [interquartile range 47-59] years; 101 men) were included. The FD and SAC groups included 65 and 59 IVADAs, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 47 matched pairs. The rates of immediate complete occlusion were significantly lower in the matched FD group than in the matched SAC group (6.4% vs 68.1%, p < 0.001). The rates of periprocedural cerebrovascular complications were comparable between the two matched groups (6.4% vs 6.4%, p > 0.99). At last follow-up, the rates of complete occlusion (89.4% vs 80.9%, p = 0.39) and favorable clinical outcomes (100.0% vs 97.9%, p > 0.99) were comparab...