Effect of Intraoperative Infusion of Esketamine on Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

作者：Jingyue Zhang, Fan Wang, Jingjing Dang, Huiwen Zheng, Baiqing Ren, Chao Liu, Ronghua Zuo, Rui Wang, Tianya Liu, Zhiping Wang · 发表于：Pain and Therapy · 年份：2023 · DOI：10.1007/s40122-023-00519-9 · 被引用次数：22 · 研究领域：Anesthesia and Pain Management、Enhanced Recovery After Surgery、Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esketamine on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients (n = 74) scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly divided into two groups: the esketamine group (group E: 0.5 mg/kg/h infusion, i.e., 0.2 mL/kg/h) or the control group (group C: 0.2 mL/kg/h normal saline infusion). The infusions were stopped 20 min before the end of the procedure. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The secondary outcomes included QoR-40 scores on PODs 2 and 7, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on PODs 1, 2, and 7, time to extubation, additional postoperative analgesic use, length of hospital stay, and time to first exhaust. Additonally, the safety indices were also recorded, including hemodynamic profile, perioperative anesthesia index (Ai), utilization of vasoactive drugs or urapidil, and side effects. RESULTS: All in all, 70 of the 74 patients completed the study, 35 in each group. The difference of QoR-40 scores on POD 1 was both statistically and clinically significant [difference 7.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.17, 9.25, p < 0.001]. The difference of QoR-40 on POD 2 was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (difference 4.81, 95% CI 2.69, 6.92, p < 0.001). The difference of NRS scores on POD 1 was statistically significant (difference -1.23, 95% CI -2.36, -0.10, p = 0.033). Compared with group C, group E ...