Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Effect of mouthwashes on gingival healing after surgical procedures: A systematic review

作者:Maísa Casarin, Raquele Soares Matos, Wagner da Silva Nolasco, Flavia Q M Pirih, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz · 发表于:European Journal Of Oral Sciences · 年份:2023 · DOI:10.1111/eos.12931 · 被引用次数:8 · 研究领域:Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments、Oral microbiology and periodontitis research、Oral and gingival health research

Abstract The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature regarding the effect of different mouthwashes on gingival healing after oral surgery in adults. Searches were conducted in seven databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials Registry, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to April 2022. The selection of studies, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal were performed independently by two reviewers, and a third researcher was consulted to resolve disagreements. Data syntheses were presented narratively for the different criteria of gingival wound healing. Among 4502 articles retrieved from the databases, 13 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present review. Chlorhexidine was the most frequent mouthwash studied (eight studies) and was used in different concentrations and combinations. Cetylpyridinium chloride, H2Ocean Sea Salt, Commiphora molmol 0.5%, chlorhexidine 0.12%, and essential oils reported better healing than a negative control. However, the uncertain risk of bias in most RCTs included in this review precludes definitive conclusions. Well‐designed RCTs are therefore still needed in this area.