Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Discrimination of Pb-Zn deposit types using sphalerite geochemistry: New insights from machine learning algorithm

作者:Xiaoming Li, Yixin Zhang, Zhan-Ke Li, Xin-Fu Zhao, Renguang Zuo, Xiao Fan, Yi Zheng · 发表于:Geoscience Frontiers · 年份:2023 · DOI:10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101580 · 被引用次数:92 · 研究领域:Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping、Mineral Processing and Grinding、Metal Extraction and Bioleaching

Due to the combined influences such as ore-forming temperature, fluid and metal sources, sphalerite tends to incorporate diverse contents of trace elements during the formation of different types of Lead-zinc (Pb-Zn) deposits. Therefore, trace elements in sphalerite have long been utilized to distinguish Pb-Zn deposit types. However, previous discriminant diagrams usually contain two or three dimensions, which are limited to revealing the complicated interrelations between trace elements of sphalerite and the types of Pb-Zn deposits. In this study, we aim to prove that the sphalerite trace elements can be used to classify the Pb-Zn deposit types and extract key factors from sphalerite trace elements that can discriminate Pb-Zn deposit types using machine learning algorithms. A dataset of nearly 3600 sphalerite spot analyses from 95 Pb-Zn deposits worldwide determined by LA-ICP-MS was compiled from peer-reviewed publications, containing 12 elements (Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Ga, Ge, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, and Pb) from 5 types, including Sedimentary Exhalative (SEDEX), Mississippi Valley Type (MVT), Volcanic Massive Sulfide (VMS), skarn, and epithermal deposits. Random Forests (RF) is applied to the data processing and the results show that trace elements of sphalerite can successfully discriminate different types of Pb-Zn deposits except for VMS deposits, most of which are falsely distinguished as skarn and epithermal types. To further discriminate VMS deposits, future studies could focus ...