Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species

作者:Xuchen Guo, Karl J. Niklas, Yirong Li, Jianhui Xue, Peijian Shi, Julian Schrader · 发表于:Frontiers in Plant Science · 年份:2022 · DOI:10.3389/fpls.2022.832300 · 被引用次数:10 · 研究领域:Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies、Plant and animal studies、Forest ecology and management

“Diminishing returns” in leaf economics occurs when increases in lamina mass ( M ), which can either be represented by lamina dry mass (DM) or fresh mass (FM), fail to produce proportional increases in leaf surface area ( A ), such that the scaling exponent (α) for the M vs. A scaling relationship exceeds unity (i.e., α > 1.0). Prior studies have shown that FM vs. A is better than DM vs A in assessing diminishing returns in evergreen species. However, the superiority of FM vs. A over DM vs. A has been less well examined for deciduous species. Here, we applied reduced major axis protocols to test whether FM vs. A is better than DM vs. A to describe the M vs. A scaling relationship, using a total of 4271 leaves from ten deciduous and two evergreen tree species in the Fagaceae and Ulmaceae for comparison. The significance of the difference between the scaling exponents of FM vs. A and DM vs. A was tested using the bootstrap percentile method. Further, we tested the non-linearity of the FM (DM) vs. A data on a log-log scale using ordinary least squares. We found that (i) the majority of scaling exponents of FM vs. A and DM vs. A were >1 thereby confirming diminishing returns for all 12 species, (ii) FM vs. A was more robust than DM vs. A to identify the M vs. A scaling relationship, (iii) the non-linearity of the allometric model was significant for both DM vs. A and FM vs. A ., and (iv) the evergreen species of Fagaceae had significantly higher DM and FM per unit a...