Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Left atrial dysfunction may precede left atrial enlargement and abnormal left ventricular longitudinal function: a cardiac MR feature tracking study

作者:Di Zhou, Wenjing Yang, Yingxia Yang, Gang Yin, Shuang Li, Baiyan Zhuang, Jing Xu, Jian He, Weichun Wu, Yong Jiang, Xiaoxin Sun, Yining Wang, Arlene Sirajuddin, Shihua Zhao, Minjie Lu · 发表于:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · 年份:2022 · DOI:10.1186/s12872-022-02532-w · 被引用次数:49 · 研究领域:Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors、Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies、Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

BACKGROUND: The role of the dysfunction of left atrium in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease has been gradually recognized. We aim to compare the impact on left atrial (LA) function between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and hypertension (HTN) without LA enlargement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), and if possible, explore the capability of LA function for providing clinical implication and predicting clinical adverse events in the early stage of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Consecutive 60 HCM patients and 60 HTN patients with normal LA size among 1413 patients who underwent CMR were retrospectively analyzed as well as 60 controls. Left atrial and ventricular functions were quantified by volumetric and CMR-FT derived strain analysis from long and short left ventricular view cines. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, new-onset or worsening heart failure to hospitalization, and paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Compared to the controls, both HTN and HCM participants had impaired LA reservoir function (εs) and conduit function (εe) with the different stage of LA booster pump dysfunction (εa). LA strain was more sensitive than LV longitudinal strain (GLS) for evaluate primary endpoint (εs: 33.9% ± 7.5 vs. 41.2% ± 14.3, p = 0.02; εe: 13.6% ± 6.2 vs. 17.4% ± 10.4, p = 0.03; εa: 20.2% ± 6.0 vs. 23.7% ± 8.8, p = 0.07; GLS: -19.4% ± 6.4 vs. -20.0% ± 6.8, p = 0...