Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer risk in Asian populations

作者：Weang-Kee Ho, Mei-Chee Tai, Joe Dennis, Xiang Shu, Jingmei Li, Peh Joo Ho, Iona Y. Millwood, Kuang Lin, Yon-Ho Jee, Su-Hyun Lee, Nasim Mavaddat, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Kyriaki Michailidou, Jirong Long, Eldarina Wijaya, Tiara Hassan, Kartini Rahmat, Veronique Kiak Mien Tan, Benita Kiat Tee Tan, Su Ming Tan, Ern Yu Tan, Swee Ho Lim, Yu‐Tang Gao, Ying Zheng, Daehee Kang, Ji‐Yeob Choi, Wonshik Han, Han‐Byoel Lee, Michiki Kubo, Yukinori Okada, Shinichi Namba, Sue K. Park, Sung-Won Kim, Chen‐Yang Shen, Pei‐Ei Wu, Boyoung Park, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Anna H. Wu, Chiu-Chen Tseng, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Ava Kwong, Tsun Leung Chan, Esther M. John, Allison W. Kurian, Motoki Iwasaki, Taiki Yamaji, Sun-Seog Kweon, Kristan J. Aronson, Rachel A. Murphy, Woon‐Puay Koh, Chiea Chuen Khor, Jian‐Min Yuan, Rajkumar Dorajoo, Robin Walters, Zhengming Chen, Liming Li, Jun Lv, Keum Ji Jung, Peter Kraft, Paul D.B. Pharoah, Alison M. Dunning, Jacques Simard, Xiao‐Ou Shu, Cheng Har Yip, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Antonis C. Antoniou, Wei Zheng, Mikael Hartman, Douglas F. Easton, Soo‐Hwang Teo · 发表于：Genetics in Medicine · 年份：2021 · DOI：10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.008 · 被引用次数：75 · 研究领域：Genetic Associations and Epidemiology、BRCA gene mutations in cancer、Cancer Risks and Factors

PURPOSE: Non-European populations are under-represented in genetics studies, hindering clinical implementation of breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRSs). We aimed to develop PRSs using the largest available studies of Asian ancestry and to assess the transferability of PRS across ethnic subgroups. METHODS: The development data set comprised 138,309 women from 17 case-control studies. PRSs were generated using a clumping and thresholding method, lasso penalized regression, an Empirical Bayes approach, a Bayesian polygenic prediction approach, or linear combinations of multiple PRSs. These PRSs were evaluated in 89,898 women from 3 prospective studies (1592 incident cases). RESULTS: The best performing PRS (genome-wide set of single-nucleotide variations [formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism]) had a hazard ratio per unit SD of 1.62 (95% CI = 1.46-1.80) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.635 (95% CI = 0.622-0.649). Combined Asian and European PRSs (333 single-nucleotide variations) had a hazard ratio per SD of 1.53 (95% CI = 1.37-1.71) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.621 (95% CI = 0.608-0.635). The distribution of the latter PRS was different across ethnic subgroups, confirming the importance of population-specific calibration for valid estimation of breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: PRSs developed in this study, from association data from multiple ancestries, can enhance risk stratification for women of Asian ancestry.