Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence

作者：Stefanie Muff, Erlend B. Nilsen, Robert B. O’Hara, Chloé R. Nater · 发表于：Trends in Ecology & Evolution · 年份：2021 · DOI：10.1016/j.tree.2021.10.009 · 被引用次数：663 · 研究领域：Meta-analysis and systematic reviews、scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Despite much criticism, black-or-white null-hypothesis significance testing with an arbitrary P-value cutoff still is the standard way to report scientific findings. One obstacle to progress is likely a lack of knowledge about suitable alternatives. Here, we suggest language of evidence that allows for a more nuanced approach to communicate scientific findings as a simple and intuitive alternative to statistical significance testing. We provide examples for rewriting results sections in research papers accordingly. Language of evidence has previously been suggested in medical statistics, and it is consistent with reporting approaches of international research networks, like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, for example. Instead of re-inventing the wheel, ecology and evolution might benefit from adopting some of the 'good practices' that exist in other fields.