Assessment of Discordance Between Physicians and Family Members Regarding Prognosis in Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury

作者：Whitney A. Kiker, Rachel Rutz Voumard, Leah Andrews, Robert G. Holloway, Lyndia C. Brumback, Ruth A. Engelberg, J. Randall Curtis, Claire J. Creutzfeldt · 发表于：JAMA Network Open · 年份：2021 · DOI：10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28991 · 被引用次数：57 · 研究领域：Traumatic Brain Injury Research、Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment、Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Importance: Shared decision-making requires key stakeholders to align in perceptions of prognosis and likely treatment outcomes. Objective: For patients with severe acute brain injury, the objective of this study was to better understand prognosis discordance between physicians and families by determining prevalence and associated factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This mixed-methods cross-sectional study analyzed a cohort collected from January 4, 2018, to July 22, 2020. This study was conducted in the medical and cardiac intensive care units of a single neuroscience center. Participants included families, physicians, and nurses of patients admitted with severe acute brain injury. Exposures: Severe acute brain injury was defined as stroke, traumatic brain injury, or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy with a Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 12 points after hospital day 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prognosis discordance was defined as a 20% or greater difference between family and physician prognosis predictions; misunderstanding was defined as a 20% or greater difference between physician prediction and the family's estimate of physician prediction; and optimistic belief difference was defined as any difference (>0%) between family prediction and their estimate of physician prediction. Logistic regression was used to identify associations with discordance. Optimistic belief differences were analyzed as a subgroup of prognosis discordance. Results: Among ...