Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Effect of Q‐Box size on liver stiffness measurement by two‐dimensional shear wave elastography

作者:Huipeng Wang, Pengchao Zheng, Xuemei Wang, Liang Sang · 发表于:Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · 年份:2021 · DOI:10.1002/jcu.23075 · 被引用次数:6 · 研究领域:Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment、Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography、Liver Disease and Transplantation

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the Q-Box size on liver stiffness (LS) measurement by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D SWE). METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with chronic liver disease were enrolled. Each patient was continuously measured five times. The Q-Box diameter was adjusted to 10, 20, and 30 mm each time. The liver stiffness values (LSVs) at different diameters were compared in the following groups: LSVs ≤6.2 kPa, 6.2 kPa < LSVs ≤11 kPa, LSVs >11 kPa. The reliability and repeatability of LS measurement at different diameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The differences in LSVs at different Q-Box diameters were statistically significant only when LSV ≤6.2 kPa (p = 0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in standard deviation (SD), SD/median, coefficient of variation (CV), and interquartile range (IQR)/median at different Q-Box diameters (p > 0.05). There were statistical differences in minimum LSVs and percentage of minimum LSVs ≤0.2 kPa as well as in stability index (SI) and percentage of SI <90% at different Q-Box diameters (p < 0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were up to 0.98 at Q-Box diameters of 10, 20, and 30 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that Q-Box size may lead to significant differences in LSVs, especially when LSVs ≤6.2 kPa. The Q-Box size had a large effect on the reliability of a single LS measurement but did not affect the repeatability of multiple measurements.