Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical Trial Study Protocol

作者:Yongjun Liu, Chuanxi Chen, Ning Liu, Tong Li, Yao Nie, Jianfeng Wu, Xiao Liu, Wei Gao, Lei Tang, Xiangdong Guan · 发表于:Advances in Therapy · 年份:2021 · DOI:10.1007/s12325-021-01877-6 · 被引用次数:32 · 研究领域:Anesthesia and Sedative Agents、Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia、Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

INTRODUCTION: From previous studies of pharmacodynamic data in mice, rats, beagle dogs and mini pigs, frequently in direct comparison to induction doses of propofol, ciprofol produced a rapid onset of anesthesia/sedation. METHODS: A phase 1 study suggested potential clinical advantages of ciprofol as a sedation/anesthetic agent, with no evidence of drug-related toxicity. However, the sedation effects and safety of ciprofol in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation should be further confirmed in a phase 3 study with a larger cohort of patients. During a phase 3, non-inferiority, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, propofol controlled trial, Chinese ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and requiring endotracheal intubation will be sedated for 6-24 h after randomization. Considering a success rate for ICU sedation of 99% for ciprofol and the positive control drug propofol, a total sample size of 120 subjects with mechanical ventilation will be required to achieve 80% power to determine non-inferiority with a margin of 8%. Finally, taking into account 10% losses, 135 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to ciprofol (90 cases) and propofol (45 cases) groups in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome will be the success rate of sedation satisfied by the following conditions: the time within the range of Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (+ 1 ~ - 2) must account for ≥ 70% of the study drug administration time and without other rescue trea...