Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Abstract CT009: IMbrave150: Updated efficacy and safety by risk status in patients (pts) receiving atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) vs sorafenib (sor) as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

作者:Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Masafumi Ikeda, Peter R. Galle, Michel Ducreux, Tae‐You Kim, Masatoshi Kudo, Ho Yeong Lim, В. В. Бредер, Philippe Merle, Ahmed O. Kaseb, Daneng Li, Yin‐Hsun Feng, Wendy Verret, Alan Nicholas, Lindong Li, Ning Ma, Andrew X. Zhu, Ann‐Lii Cheng · 发表于:Cancer Research · 年份:2021 · DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-ct009 · 被引用次数:17 · 研究领域:Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis、Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies、Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis

Abstract Background: Based on the Ph III IMbrave150 trial, atezo + bev has been approved globally and is the standard of care for pts with unresectable HCC who have not received prior systemic therapy. With an additional 12 mo of follow-up from the primary analysis (median, 15.6 mo), atezo + bev showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit and safety (Finn ASCO GI 2021). Here, we report results of updated analyses considering high-risk factors. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive atezo 1200 mg IV q3w + bev 15 mg/kg IV q3w or sor 400 mg PO BID until loss of clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. High-risk pts were defined as those who had tumor invasion of the main trunk of the portal vein and/or the portal vein branch contralateral to the primarily involved lobe (Vp4), and/or bile duct invasion and/or tumor occupancy of ≥ 50% of liver. Results: In the ITT population, 64 (19%) pts randomized to atezo + bev and 37 (22%) pts randomized to sor were defined as high risk. 10 pts had bile duct invasion, 73 had Vp4 portal vein invasion and 31 had liver tumor occupancy of ≥ 50%. 9 pts in the atezo + bev arm and 4 pts in the sor arm had 2 high-risk factors. OS, PFS and ORR all favored atezo + bev over sor, in both non-high-risk and high-risk patients. See table for efficacy results. In safety-evaluable pts, Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 122 (45%) of 269 non-high-risk and 21 (35%) of 60 high-risk atezo + bev pts. Grade 5 TRAEs occurred in 5...