Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating acute low back pain: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

作者：Boyu Wu, Lei Yang, Chengwei Fu, Gonghui Jian, Yue Zhuo, Mulin Yao, Hui Xiong · 发表于：Annals of Palliative Medicine · 年份：2021 · DOI：10.21037/apm-21-551 · 被引用次数：22 · 研究领域：Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies、Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology、Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Acute low back pain (ALBP) is common and acupuncture therapy is a treatment option. The comparative efficacy and safety of different acupuncture therapies are still unclear. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of different acupuncture therapies for ALBP. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The outcome indicators measured were visual analog scale (VAS) score, lumbar range of motion (ROM) score, and adverse events. The risk of bias among included studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. WinBUGS 1.4 was used for the NMA. RESULTS: In total, nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 1,427 participants were included. Results of NMA showed the following: (I) compared with placebo, motion style acupuncture (MSA) (SMD: -2.21; 95% CI, -3.33 to -1.08), manual acupuncture (MA) (SMD: -1.14; 95% CI, -2.01 to -0.27), and electroacupuncture (EA) (SMD: -1.57; 95% CI, -2.98 to -0.15) were found to be more effective for decreasing VAS score; (II) compared with pharmacotherapy, MSA (SMD: -1.00; 95% CI, -1.47 to -0.54) and MA (SMD: -0.60; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.05) were found to be more effective in reducing ROM score. Results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that all acupuncture types were superi...