Lead I R‐wave amplitude to distinguish ventricular arrhythmias with lead V 3 transition originating from the left versus right ventricular outflow tract

作者：Jue Wang, Chenglong Miao, Guangmin Yang, Lu Xu, Xing Ru, Yan Jia, Ruining Zhang, Yanwei Wang, Liu Huang, Suyun Liu · 发表于：Clinical Cardiology · 年份：2020 · DOI：10.1002/clc.23511 · 被引用次数：4 · 研究领域：Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments、Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias、Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Abstract Background The electrophysiology algorithm for localizing left or right origins of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OT‐VAs) with lead V 3 transition still needs further investigation in clinical practice. Hypothesis Lead I R‐wave amplitude is effective in distinguishing the left or right origin of OT‐VAs with lead V 3 transition. Methods We measured lead I R‐wave amplitude in 82 OT‐VA patients with lead V 3 transition and a positive complex in lead I who underwent successful catheter ablation from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). The optimal R‐wave threshold was identified, compared with the V 2 S/V 3 R index, transitional zone (TZ) index, and V 2 transition ratio, and validated in a prospective cohort study. Results Lead I R‐wave amplitude for LVOT origins was significantly higher than that for RVOT origins (0.55 ± 0.13 vs. 0.32 ± 0.15 mV; p < .001). The area under the curve (AUC) for lead I R‐wave amplitude as assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.926, with a cutoff value of ≥0.45 predicting LVOT origin with 92.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity, superior to the V 2 S/V 3 R index, TZ index, and V 2 transition ratio. VAs in the LVOT group mainly originated from the right coronary cusp (RCC) and left and right coronary cusp junction (L‐RCC). In the prospective study, lead I R‐wave amplitude identified the LVOT origin with 92.3% accuracy. Conclusion Lead I R‐wave amplitude pro...