Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir plus entecavir combination therapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis patients with partial virological response to entecavir

作者:Yong‐Hong Wang, Juan Liao, Dongmei Zhang, Dong‐Bo Wu, Ya‐Chao Tao, Meng‐Lan Wang, En‐Qiang Chen, Hong Tang · 发表于:Journal of Medical Virology · 年份:2019 · DOI:10.1002/jmv.25608 · 被引用次数:11 · 研究领域:Hepatitis B Virus Studies、Hepatitis C virus research、Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy and TDF + entecavir (ETV) combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with the partial virological response (PVR) to ETV. METHODS: CHB patients with PVR to ETV were switched to TDF monotherapy or TDF + ETV combination therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a virological response (VR), and the secondary efficacy outcomes were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. The primary safety outcomes were changes in serum creatinine and serum phosphorus levels. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were investigated, including 63 patients in the TDF monotherapy group and 80 patients in the TDF + ETV combination therapy group. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The median age of patients was 44.5 years, and 76.2% of them were male. The VR rate in TDF + ETV group was higher than that of the TDF group at 48 weeks (88.8% vs 71.4%; P = .009). At 48 weeks, the HBeAg seroconversion rate of TDF + ETV group was higher than that of the TDF group (30% vs 15.9%; P = .049). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with elevated ALT in the TDF group and TDF + ETV group at 48 weeks (9.5% vs 7.5%; P = .665). After adjusting the treatment regimen, serum creatinine levels increased slightly and serum phosphorus level decreased slightl...