The application of barbed suture during the partial nephrectomy may modify perioperative results: a systematic review and meta-analysis

作者：Yifei Lin, Banghua Liao, Sike Lai, Jin Huang, Liang Du, Kunjie Wang, Hong Li · 发表于：BMC Urology · 年份：2019 · DOI：10.1186/s12894-018-0435-3 · 被引用次数：18 · 研究领域：Surgical Sutures and Adhesives、Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques、Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

BACKGROUND: Barbed sutures can avoid knot tying and speed the suture placement in the PN(partial nephrectomy). On account of the impact on clinical outcomes are ambiguous, this study is determined to identify the application of barbed suture during PN. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for RCTs(randomized controlled trials) and cohort studies focusing on the comparison of barbed and traditional sutures in PN(last updated on Feb in 2015). According to Cochrane Library's suggestion, quality assessment was performed. Review Manager was applied to analyze all the data and sensitivity analyses were performed through omitting each study sequentially. RESULTS: Eight cohort studies and none of RCTs proved eligible (risk of bias: moderate to low,431 patients). Warm ischemia time(MD = - 6.55,95% CI -8.86 to - 4.24, P < 0.05) decreased statistically in the barbed suture group, as well as operative time(MD = - 11.29,95% CI -17.87 to-4.71, P < 0.05). Postoperative complications also reduced significantly(OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to0.80, P < 0.05). Unidirectional barbed suture resulted in fewer postoperative complications based on the subgroup analysis(OR = 0.48,95% CI 0.24 to 0.94, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The barbed suture may be a useful surgical innovation which can modify perioperative results for surgeons and patients. Randomly-designed studies with longer follow up and larger sample sizes are in the need of to explore th...