Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men

作者:Lars Boesen, Nis Nørgaard, Vibeke Løgager, I. Balslev, Rasmus Bisbjerg, Karen-Cecilie Thestrup, Mads Dochedahl Winther, Henrik Loft Jakobsen, Henrik S. Thomsen · 发表于:JAMA Network Open · 年份:2018 · DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0219 · 被引用次数:189 · 研究领域:Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment、Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research、Urologic and reproductive health conditions

Importance: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enhances detection and risk stratification for significant prostate cancer but is time-consuming (approximately 40 minutes) and expensive. Rapid and simpler (approximately 15-minute) biparametric MRI (bpMRI) using fewer scan sequences could be implemented as a prostate MRI triage test on a larger scale before performing biopsies. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value (NPV) of a novel bpMRI method in biopsy-naive men in detecting and ruling out significant prostate cancer in confirmatory biopsies. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-institutional, paired, prospective cohort study of biopsy-naive men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer from November 1, 2015, to June 15, 2017. Interventions: All patients underwent bpMRI (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging) followed by standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies (all men) and targeted biopsies of men with suspicious bpMRI findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Suspicion grades of bpMRI, biopsy results, and NPV of bpMRI were evaluated for detection of or ruling out significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥4 + 3 or maximum cancerous core length >50% for Gleason score 3 + 4). We compared the diagnostic performance of standard biopsies in all men vs standard plus targeted (combined) biopsies restricted to men with suspicious bpMRI findings. The reference standard was combined biopsy results from all men. Res...