Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

作者:Qiulu Zhong, Xiaodong Zhu, Ling Li, Song Qu, Zhongguo Liang, Fanyan Zeng, Xin‐Bin Pan · 发表于:Oncotarget · 年份:2017 · DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.14799 · 被引用次数:13 · 研究领域:Head and Neck Cancer Studies、Biological Research and Disease Studies、Cancer Research and Treatment

// Qiulu Zhong 1 , Xiaodong Zhu 1 , Ling Li 1 , Song Qu 1 , Zhongguo Liang 1 , Fanyan Zeng 1 and Xinbin Pan 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China Correspondence to: Xiaodong Zhu, email: // Keywords : nasopharyngeal carcinoma; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy Received : August 15, 2016 Accepted : December 07, 2016 Published : January 23, 2017 Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy compared with IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2014, we collected 797 staged II-IVb [UICC = Union for International Cancer Control criteria (7th edition)] NPC patients for analysis. After 1:1 matching ,we selected 261 cases as the CCRT group, another 261 patients as the CCRT+AC group. Using Kaplan-Meier to calculate the overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival(LFFS), distant metastasis failure-free survival(DMFS). The log-rank test and Cox-proportional hazards model to evaluate the prognostic factors. Results: After matching, there were 261 patients in each group. In CCRT+AC group, The 1-,2- and 3- year os rates were a little higher than in CCRT group(99.6% vs 97.9%,97.4% vs 96.2%,9...