Chinese Version of Nolen-Hoeksema Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) Used in 912 College Students:Reliability and Validity

作者：Xiu Han, Hongfei Yang · 发表于：Zhongguo linchuang xinlixue zazhi · 年份：2009 · 被引用次数：116 · 研究领域：Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies、Youth Substance Use and School Attendance、Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Objective: To explore the reliability and validity of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese version. Methods: A total of 912 Chinese college students completed the RRS. Results: All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including χ2、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI、IFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The α coefficients of the scale and subscales and test -retest reliabilities were over 0.63. There was gender difference in rumination level. Conclusion: RRS is appropriate for the assessment of rumination in Chinese colleges.