Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Team Training in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program for Interns: Teamwork and Quality of Resuscitations

作者:Eric J. Thomas, Amber L. Williams, Eric F. Reichman, Robert E. Lasky, Sharon S. Crandell, William R. Taggart · 发表于:PEDIATRICS · 年份:2010 · DOI:10.1542/peds.2009-1635 · 被引用次数:171 · 研究领域:Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare、Neonatal Respiratory Health Research、Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVE: Poor communication and teamwork may contribute to errors during neonatal resuscitation. Our objective was to evaluate whether interns who received a 2-hour teamwork training intervention with the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) demonstrated more teamwork and higher quality resuscitations than control subjects. METHODS: Participants were noncertified 2007 and 2008 incoming interns for pediatrics, combined pediatrics and internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology (n = 98). Pediatrics and combined pediatrics/internal medicine interns were eligible for 6-month follow-up (n = 34). A randomized trial was conducted in which half of the participants in the team training arm practiced NRP skills by using high-fidelity simulators; the remaining practiced with low-fidelity simulators, as did control subjects. Blinded, trained observers viewed video recordings of high-fidelity-simulated resuscitations for teamwork and resuscitation quality. RESULTS: High-fidelity training (HFT) group had higher teamwork frequency than did control subjects (12.8 vs 9.0 behaviors per minute; P < .001). Intervention groups maintained more workload management (control subjects: 89.3%; low-fidelity training [LFT] group: 98.0% [P < .001]; HFT group: 98.8%; HFT group versus control subjects [P < .001]) and completed resuscitations faster (control subjects: 10.6 minutes; LFT group: 8.6 minutes [P = .040]; HFT group: 7.4 minutes; HFT group versus control ...