Scholay

学术搜索 · AI 审稿 · LaTeX 协作

Fidaxomicin versus Conventional Antimicrobial Therapy in 59 Recipients of Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea

作者:Dana Clutter, Yanina Dubrovskaya, Man Yee Merl, Lewis Teperman, Robert Press, Amar Safdar · 发表于:Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 年份:2013 · DOI:10.1128/aac.01120-13 · 被引用次数:52 · 研究领域:Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research、Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology、Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

The feasibility of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin and metronidazole (conventional therapy) was assessed in 59 transplant recipients with 61 episodes of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). Overall clinical cure was achieved in 86% of episodes, and in 7% of episodes, infection recurred. Fidaxomicin was well tolerated. Clinical cures were not significantly different compared with conventional therapy (67% versus 89%, respectively; P = 0.06). Univariate analysis of predictors for lack of clinical cure included continued use of broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics (P = 0.026) and prior diagnosis of CDAD (95% confidence interval, 1.113 to 19.569; odds ratio, 4.667; P = 0.041). New-onset vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization was not noted after fidaxomicin therapy alone. However, this occurred in 10 of 28 patients (36%) following conventional therapy, and 2 of 3 patients with subsequent bacteremia died.