Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology

作者：Jens B. Asendorpf, Mark T. Conner, Filip De Fruyt, Jan De Houwer, Jaap J. A. Denissen, Klaus Fiedler, Susann Fiedler, David C. Funder, Reinhold M. Kliegl, Brian A. Nosek, Marco Perugini, Brent W. Roberts, Manfred Schmitt, Marcel A. G. van Aken, Hannelore Weber, Jelte M. Wicherts · 发表于：European Journal of Personality · 年份：2013 · DOI：10.1002/per.1919 · 被引用次数：863 · 研究领域：Meta-analysis and systematic reviews、scientometrics and bibliometrics research、Mental Health Research Topics

Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.